« do I blog? or delicious? | Main | Randomness in Universality Classes »
February 19, 2005
the quiltmakers
i'm making sense of weinberger thru the quiltmakers of gee's bend, alabama. this band of women have been sewing quilts with small, disjointed pieces of fabric and cloth. in one quilt, it is not uncommon to find the lining from an old winter coat, the sleeve of a sunday dress, and a baby's blanket. i learned about these quiltmakers after stumbling upon a documentary on the local pbs station.
it's easy to see the symbolism. i mean the quiltmakers use small pieces, although they were joined more tightly: the web is small pieces, loosely joined. but the quiltmakers, and weinberger's look at the web, represent something more significant, more hopeful..."like a world, it is an abiding place where we can accomplish together whatever it is that our caring natures put us up to" (193).
in the same way that the web is beyond time and space, the quilts are equally free from such constraints. for generations, quilt-making traditions have been passed down from grandmother to mother to daughter; many of the depression-era quilts are still around. the threading of time and space, much like the process that connects patchwork pieces of cloth and fabric, allows individual readers to making their own meaning. so, when i look at those quilts from my 2005 perspective, they will have a different meaning than that of my 1997, pre-graduate work self. in my mind, i'll arrange the shapes and patterns according the whatever cognitive frameworks exist. i "order" the quilt in the same way that i "order" my web experience.
in his preface, weinberger asks: "what is true to our nature and what only looked that way because it was a response to a world that was, until now, the only one we had?" (xii). i think about that quote as i make my way thru this blog-mediated environment and continue to look at quilts from gee's bend, alabama. it is reductive to say that the quiltmakers were simply making the best of the merger resources they had. instead, i situate them alongside the web makers, web thinkers, and web users. i'm not concerned about whether or not a community of poor, uneducated african-american women have read saussure, foucalt, bourdieu, or burke. instead, and what is most productive for my reading and understanding of network theory, i choose to focus on how this discourse community was "true" to its nature. if you look ath the quilts hard enough, you will see reflections of racism, oppression, domestic abuse, economic and political powerlessness, and triumph, love, hope, laughter, and strength.
"most of all," reminds weinberger, "the web is a more honest--because unguarded--reflection of what we are like when we seek one another without the limitations the real world imposes on us. it's not always a pretty picture, but it's a hell of a lot more fun than posing in your prom outfit all your life" (194).
Posted by emnorris at February 19, 2005 11:49 AM
Comments
Since you posted, Elisa, I've been thinking about Jonathan Harris's 10x10 project as a kind of pomo quilt--the media pastiche of the moment. I don't know whether it matches up, but Johndan Johnson-Eilola has an interesting post at datacloud today about nongeographic maps, which seems to apply both to the metaphor of small pieces and to the socially stiched quilts you refer to.
Posted by: Derek at February 22, 2005 04:41 PM
I think that is the neat thing about networks. Even though specific networks are fixed in context, like the quilt makers of Gee's bend, their ideas circulate in other contexts. For example, here we are -- some farther than others away from that group of women -- and we are discussing, looking, noting the importance and existence of those quilts. The way information circulates on the web seems to open up the definitions of groups all the while showing them to be uniquely gathered. It is a timeless piece of information formed from a time-bound context, and that is really interesting to me.
Posted by: jenwingard at February 22, 2005 07:32 PM
I know this through a songwriter friend of mine who based a song on it. She is very interested in quilts and was fascinated to discover that some quilts were designed as symbolic maps with images to help escaped slaves recognize stops on the Underground Railroad. In other words, they were literally diagrams of a network. (Chances are you know of these already.)
Posted by: hj at February 23, 2005 11:00 PM
d-
thanks for the link. it made me wonder if the individual pieces that were sewn into the quilts carried with them the wealth of information that those images on the 10x10 did.
Posted by: elisa at February 26, 2005 12:46 AM
j-
and something else that is happening, at least for me, is a recognition that my culturally specific knowledge can inform conversations in other places. you know what i mean...
Posted by: elisa at February 26, 2005 12:49 AM
h-
i know a little about the slave quilts. take about hiding in plain sight, huh? just another example of how one's subjectivity informs/influences their relationships with texts.
Posted by: elisa at February 26, 2005 12:51 AM